3D-Daz Daz3d Art - Show Us Your DazSkill

5.00 star(s) 13 Votes
Discussion Reviews (13)
Leeduva

Leeduva

Member
Mar 3, 2020
376
708
Toxictitan said:
I don't have better gen3m character and my PC didn't load gen8m character for unknown reason I am trying to find black g3m character with decent material but I couldn't find it yet so I used m7 material and tweak it to make black.
Click to expand...
Damn you missed the sale on Mace. A few days ago. He was literally $.84¢ A few days ago.https://www.daz3d.com/mace-for-genesis-3-male He on sale now for like$3.14
So it still a good buy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toxictitan
DiosDecay

DiosDecay

Member
Mar 2, 2018
282
1,664
Little Dove Devil said:
I'm playing with lighting and poses, any advice?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
For lighting it is a nice start I might probably add a little more light to highlight her face or some back light to highlight them a little more, though without an environment it is hard to determine if more or less light is needed, like are they in their bedroom or a sleazy hotel? are they an exhibitionist couple in the park at night or a alley behind the club?

As for the pose, what are you aiming for? realism or something else? realistically the guy wouldn't be able to do much, one pump and she would most likely fall backwards, maybe having his hands on her shoulders will stop that though you would have to change the angle of the shot, though it is porn so people are willing to suspend disbelief or make exceptions. Also his pinky finger on his right hand is clipping into her so just be careful with that.

Though I do like how her expression is, nice looking model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 46n2
ArturiousDesign

ArturiousDesign

Engaged Member
Jan 31, 2019
3,991
15,103
Little Dove Devil said:
I'm playing with lighting and poses, any advice?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
What's your lighting setup. can we see a Screenshot
Screenshot (363).png
JuniorTheJunior said:
HEY! Nobody said it had to be hot sexy girls all the time, alright?

View attachment 2075354
View attachment 2075353
Click to expand...
I love his beard. how did you do that. I could totally see him in some type of cyberpunk game. Also, nice clean render man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doku99
46n2

46n2

Member
Jun 29, 2021
430
1,140
Shoe_Lac3 said:
Assuming that the difference in the amount of sclera (white eye parts) between the eyes prompted your comment, I was gonna agree with you after some quick look at some human references, and recalling the look node in powerpose not being 100% consistant.

After some further digging and some quick test in daz however, I think it might have to do with her outter eyeshape being greatly exaggerated compared to that of a human. So that extra sclera compared to the left eye might make it seem like the eyes are off.

I tried compensating either eye from the original pose (to lessen the difference in sclera in their respective direction), neither I found to be an improvement.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

I do see an argument to slightly compensate the r_eye, but after comparing the results, I'm honestly not too bothered by it, nor am I convinced that the OG pose is actually anatomically incorrect (especially with her eyes not following the exact anatomy and all).

Anyway, thanks for pointing it out. Will definitely keep an eye out in the future.
Click to expand...
I’ve tried several methods, including:
-Look at Me (which helps considerably in at least setting up a plenty accurate reference point)
-Or rigging a Cam (just outside) the surface of the pupil and lining it up with an Object (or another character eye opposite), well before ever implementing her in a scene. Then adjusting her view using neck/head/eyes within any scene.

Depending on the angle she might need, one of the eyes is often a little off. And I cannot for the life of me figure out why, nor a way around it. Only solution is to manually make the adjustment as you did above - which is a gigantic pain in the ass to even identify as accurate.


But the greater purpose of my post was to compliment your work - not question it ; )
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shoe_Lac3
46n2

46n2

Member
Jun 29, 2021
430
1,140
PikZik said:
Here is a no postwork picture except a slight denoising, as it seems that I "just postworked, painting over a bad render" (I caricature a little) my last artwork which was intended to look like a movie poster btw (inspired by Kompromat) and to be the main screen of my maybecomingoneday game. :p

View attachment 2075239




I feel your pain. I also have a GTX 1060 (3Gb) in my craptop. For the pic above, 1500 iterations - CPU only -> rendering time 6h30. :cry:
But i've been told that hardware doesn't matter....
Click to expand...
Holly hell - 6h30?! I am also on a GTX 1060, tend to go with 500its. And I can generally get away with a 30min render (w/Denoiser). Some situations it goes 2hrs and the resulting quality is crap. Generally, there's a window involved when that happens.

Can any of the Pros here identify from that image above what may have cost him so much rendering time? Anything most obvious that would have? Or is it all just a problem, collectively? Any recommendations to help alleviate the strain?

-Beautiful shot, btw. She may have been worthy ; )
 
46n2

46n2

Member
Jun 29, 2021
430
1,140
jackmancactus said:
View attachment 2075756

Trying to go for an amateur-ish face cropped out sort of thing because I've always liked those types of pics. Kinda undecided if I like it or not though.
Click to expand...
I would agree that's a very nice intentional crop. And that yes, sometimes that type of framing choice can actually enhance the image quite provocatively. It may be that we are then subconsciously led to feed on the rest of her body (without US being seen). Or it may be that we don't quite know what her face thinks of things... so that can be plenty fetching from a curiosity perspective. Yeah?
 
3D Reaver

3D Reaver

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2020
1,466
5,844
46n2 said:
Holly hell - 6h30?! I am also on a GTX 1060, tend to go with 500its. And I can generally get away with a 30min render (w/Denoiser). Some situations it goes 2hrs and the resulting quality is crap. Generally, there's a window involved when that happens.

Can any of the Pros here identify from that image above what may have cost him so much rendering time? Anything most obvious that would have? Or is it all just a problem, collectively? Any recommendations to help alleviate the strain?

-Beautiful shot, btw. She may have been worthy ; )
Click to expand...
Cpu rendering is slow...Really fucking slow. i had a 3gb 1060 before i got the 12gb 3060 and getting any image to fit in that was pretty much impossible
 
  • Like
Reactions: PikZik
DitaVonTease

DitaVonTease

Active Member
Jul 25, 2021
616
1,292
46n2 said:
Holly hell - 6h30?! I am also on a GTX 1060, tend to go with 500its. And I can generally get away with a 30min render (w/Denoiser). Some situations it goes 2hrs and the resulting quality is crap. Generally, there's a window involved when that happens.

Can any of the Pros here identify from that image above what may have cost him so much rendering time? Anything most obvious that would have? Or is it all just a problem, collectively? Any recommendations to help alleviate the strain?

-Beautiful shot, btw. She may have been worthy ; )
Click to expand...

Several things can affect Render times, the size of 'Off-Screen Set', ie how big the set was, compared to how much was visible in the render. Levels of detail will also affect the Render Time, the more detail the longer the time. Also the Lighting can affect Render Times, the more lights, like details will slow things down, that also goes for the 'Cityscape Background'. Several 'Fixes' for that would be
You must be registered to see the links
, 'Camera Cutaway' removes everything outside of the camera view, but allows lighting to be unaffected, as long as you tell it to include them. Something like a 10MB image could come out as 4 or 5MB, using 'Camera Cutaway', & is quicker than going thru the Scene 'Hiding Objects' not in view, it's also good if you want to use the 'Set' for a series of renders, saves you 'forgetting to unhide objects'.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: Night Hacker, PikZik and Leeduva
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
5.00 star(s) 13 Votes